Chapter 14: Volition’s Basic Determinants, Part III—Teleions: Difference between revisions
MWMoiceanu (talk | contribs) |
MWMoiceanu (talk | contribs) m (→14.6. Regarding Metaethics and the Problem of Evil: fixed a typo) |
||
| Line 536: | Line 536: | ||
That stated, we hold free will as to which of the four synteleions we choose to believe is the eusynteleion. | That stated, we hold free will as to which of the four synteleions we choose to believe is the eusynteleion. | ||
When we as protoceptual selves thereby choose to approach pseudosynteleions (here indulging in pseudosynteleionic joys) rather than to approach the eusynteleion and, in the process intend | When we as protoceptual selves thereby choose to approach pseudosynteleions (here indulging in pseudosynteleionic joys) rather than to approach the eusynteleion and, in the process, intend to harm others so that we as egos might be closer to our chosen pseudosynteleion, we as egos then engage in evils. | ||
And, again, within apeirosonism—wherein the apeiroson is the absolute good—the reason for why pseudosynteleions occur reduces to fear of the apeiroson. Whereas in the worldviews of other synteleions, such reason is far harder, if at all possible, to come by. | And, again, within apeirosonism—wherein the apeiroson is the absolute good—the reason for why pseudosynteleions occur reduces to fear of the apeiroson. Whereas in the worldviews of other synteleions, such reason is far harder, if at all possible, to come by. | ||